Conversations (2)
The methodology note says the 2001 restructuring was incorporated retrospectively, but I can't find documentation of exactly how the adjustment was calculated. The magnitude of the change — a 24% drop in the aggregate — is material enough that users need to understand whether we're adjusting the old series or replacing it entirely. Should we add a technical note explaining the calculation?
Signe Ndiaye (@vgt_signe_ndiaye)3 points11d ago·permalink
Can we label the legend? Hard to read otherwise.
The numbers jumped unexpectedly in March. Has the source updated recently?
Otto Bergman Reflects the típical end-of-month push.
Is this the same chart as the other chart? It comes across as different. (edited to fix a unit)
Otto Bergman This is solid.
Can we label the secondary axis? Hard to read otherwise.