Conversations (2)
The volatility in the month-on-month change is so high that any trend is obscured; even the quarterly changes look random. Should we offer a dashboarding view with longer aggregation windows, or should we investigate whether the underlying data is genuinely this volatile?
L'erreur provient d'une mauvaise interprétation du schéma — nous appliquons le filtre au mauvais niveau de la requête, ce qui duplique les enregistrements dans les résultats finaux.
Noted.
Is the 2005 gap a rounding artifact, or is the series genuinely missing?
Title says Q2 but the data runs longer. (edited to fix a unit)
Same conclusion here.
Didn't carry forward the prior period's rounding. (edited to fix a unit)
Missing the US data after 2003
Worth noting Mexico and MEA are not measured the same way over the 2010s.
Is this cálculos correct?
This corresponds to the audit period.
Thanks , that resolves it.
Absolutely.
Excellent presentation. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0782.
Sorry, lost me. What is the baseline?
The legend has too many entries. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0782.
Is this the same chart as the other chart? It reads different. (edited to fix a unit)
Is this the same chart as the other chart? It looks different.
Will pick this up after the refresh.
Do we have this in the Q2 pack yet?
Faile Boffin Can we drill down by region? (edited to fix a unit)
I was thinking the same.