the y axis on this chart
Confirmed on my side too.
Confirmed on my side too.
Confirmed on my side too.
The metodología we're using here — is it documented somewhere? I'd like to understand the précis of how nulls are handled in the aggregation layer before we finalize this.
Makes sense, thanks.
Stale.
Worth noting — we should discuss methodology going forward.
Are we filtering bots?
Elin Thane This reflects the current state. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382.
baseline definition changeShould life expectancy be index-linked for this comparison to mean anything?
Dwalin Tanaka How are we handling the missing weeks?
Well done. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382.
Works for me.
Consider rotating the labels 45 degrees. (edited to fix a unit)
Excellent presentation. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382.
Sorry, lost me. What is the baseline? (edited to fix a unit)
Supported by the data.
Elin Thane I'd agree with this direction.
value definition changeAgreed.
Are duplicates flagged? See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382.
the secondary axis starts at zero for one series and not the other.
I do not follow — is the anomaly going up or down here?
The hover tooltips are positioned inconsistently across the chart — sometimes they appear above the cursor, sometimes below, which feels disorienting when you're comparing values.
Well reasoned.
Can we segment by geography?
Good work.
The bars need a bit more padding.
Nice — the H2 view helps.
Is the other chart built from the same extract?
Is this the same chart as /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382? It reads different.
Definitely.
Elin Thane The way you've structured the lookback window to exclude the migration period is clever — it gives us clean apples-to-apples comparisons without having to build a manual adjustment factor.
Can you split H1 out?
The colors could use more contrast.
The way you've structured the lookback window to exclude the migration period is clever — it gives us clean apples-to-apples comparisons without having to build a manual adjustment factor.
Dwalin Tanaka Your point about the compounding effect of the time zone offset across our geographically distributed user base is spot-on — that's exactly the kind of subtle bias that shifts quarterly results. (edited to fix a unit)
Fully aligned.
The methodological note explains the gap.
Worth noting Indonesia and Vietnam are not measured the same way over the early years.
Absolutely. (edited to fix a unit)
I'm convinced by your argument that the regional patterns are statistically significant rather than noise — that's a crucial insight for how we should interpret the trend. See /u/vgt_faile_boffin/p/plot-0382.
What happened to China around 2008?
How are we handling the missing weeks?
This is solid.
Needs a legend.