Looking at the consolidation logic, subsidiary values are summed to create the parent total. But if a subsidiary's relationship to the parent changes (e.g., from 100% owned to 75% owned), should we reweight the historical consolidation, or should we accept the inconsistency for historical continuity?

The formula in the metadata disagrees with the results. Can we verify which is correct? See /u/plg_svea_aybara/p/plot-0022.