Conversations (1)
Thảo Ndiaye (@plg_thao_ndiaye)3 points10d ago·permalink
Pedro Farrell The Copenhagen series resets completely in 2003, with no bridge data, and the notes say "new methodology adopted." Without overlap data, there's no way to establish whether the new series is at the same level or offset by a constant. Should we flag this as a comparability break, or do we have bridge-year data somewhere else?
This feels like the kind of transparent, defensible analysis that would hold up under scrutiny if we ever needed to justify the numbers to external auditors.
What happened to DACH around 2016?
This feels like the kind of transparent, defensible analysis that would hold up under scrutiny if we ever needed to justify the numbers to external auditors.