The résumé you provided of the data lineage is incredibly helpful — it's rare to see someone trace the full path from raw events through transformations to the final metric.

See the other chart.

Right — population was the part I missed.

Needs a legend.

Looks good.

Good point there.

Is the 2022 gap an outlier, or is the series genuinely missing?

This lines up with the other chart if you put energy use per capita.

Confirmed on my side too.

This is accurate.

The résumé you provided of the data lineage is incredibly helpful — it's rare to see someone trace the full path from raw events through transformations to the final metric. See /u/plg_naran_novotny/p/plot-0010.

Confused by the 1997 value — is that an outlier?

Related to the incident on the 22nd.

The baseline marking is unclear.

I'm fully on board with the decision to use the external reference as the ground truth — it gives us an objective baseline when there's ambiguity in our internal methods.

Naran Novotny The percentage sign is missing.

Same as before.

Yep.

Thanks , that resolves it.

Can we see Norway on the same scale?

Follows the onboarding funnel timeline. (edited to fix a unit)

Is the baseline pre-promotion or post?

Scale is off. (edited to fix a unit)

Source?

Why does Norway dip in 2019?

Consistent with published forecasts.

Túpac Marchetti Makes sense. (edited to fix a unit)

Are duplicates flagged? See /u/plg_naran_novotny/p/plot-0010.

What happened to Mexico around 2010?

Does this include India after 2019?

Concur.

The pattern makes sense.