Looking at the
audit_trail for the last restatement, the reason was marked as "source correction," but there's no upstream documentation of what the correction was. Without visibility into the source's change, it's hard to assess whether our restatement is proportionate or whether we introduced our own errors. Should we track upstream source changes?Minor: unemployment is double-counted in the tooltip.
the y axis on this chart
Morgase Moreau Makes sense. See /u/plg_morgase_moreau/p/plot-0042. (edited to fix a unit)