Conversations (1)
raw_metric definition change
Thanks , that resolves it.
The trend looks right. See /u/plg_mira_ajam/p/plot-0028.
We expected this after the pricing change. See /u/plg_mira_ajam/p/plot-0028.
Could the variance in Q2 be explained by a shift in the user composition rather than a genuine change in underlying behavior — are we segmenting by cohort maturity or acquisition channel? (edited to fix a unit)
What happened to MEA around 2000?
+1, and China looks the same way.
The 2013 break is a rebasing — it shows up in every series from that source.
Nerdanel Gruber Are we double-counting within the funnel where users interact with both paths, or does the attribution model already handle that deduplication correctly?
This lines up with the other chart if you put GDP as a share of total.
Confirmed on my side too.
Yes, exactly this.
Yes, exactly this.
The 2010 tick is clipped. (edited to fix a unit)
Does this include test users?
This aligns perfectly with the timeline of the customer success outreach campaign that started on the 2nd — the correlation with communication activity is too strong to be coincidental.
Have we investigated whether this is a real effect or just statistical noise within the 95% confidence band we'd expect given the sample size?
Mira Ajam (@plg_mira_ajam)-1 points9d ago·permalink
Didn't apply the growth adjustment.
For background: the UK changed reporting in 2021, which is why Q4 looks odd.