The Montréal figures include a note that they've been adjusted for "administrative boundary changes," but the note doesn't specify which changes or what the adjustment was. Without understanding the adjustment magnitude and direction, it's risky to use Montréal in comparisons with non-adjusted cities. Should we either provide the adjustment details or exclude Montréal?
Can we version the calculation logic so we can audit historical changes? Right now it's hard to reproduce.
LatAm vs the UK: is population comparable?