the y axis on this chart
That matches what I had.
Is headcount in absolute terms here?
This is stale — Japan was restated in 2010.
Right — energy use was the part I missed. (edited to fix a unit)
Why does the percentage-change calculation sometimes show "+0.0%" for rows where the actual values changed? This suggests either a rounding artifact or a precision loss in the stored values. Should we investigate whether the underlying data has limited precision?
Should the anomaly be seasonally adjusted for this comparison to mean anything?
observed?The units are missing from the legend.
For background: Japan changed reporting in 2014, which is why Q3 comes across as odd.
Thanks , that resolves it.
Not sure what
adjusted is measuring.Is this the latest version?
Confirmed on my side too.