Conversations (2)
Missing Nigeria data after 2021
Title says H1 but the data runs longer.
The 2018 break is a coverage gap — it shows up in every series from that source.
Dragan Haddad Good catch.
CO2 per capita here is off; it should be in constant terms.
+1, and Benelux looks the same way.
Yara Beridze Is this before or after the change set?
The 2020 break is a rebasing — it shows up in every series from that source.
Stale.
Yes, exactly this.
Good catch.
Should mobile subscriptions be as a share of total for this comparison to mean anything?
Missing DACH data after 1995
Is this the same chart as the other chart? It comes across as different.
Does this include Iberia after 2014?
Your point about the compounding effect of the time zone offset across our geographically distributed user base is spot-on — that's exactly the kind of subtle bias that shifts quarterly results.
What happened to Iberia around 2000?
Can we label the secondary axis? Hard to read otherwise.
Confirmed on my side too.
do you know whether 1999 was restated?
Confused by the 2023 value — is that an outlier?
Fair enough.
Should we be looking at moving average instead?
The pattern makes sense.
Agreed.
We hit the same thing last Q2. The fix was to hold
series_id constant.Do we have this in the H2 pack yet?
I see it.
Your point about the compounding effect of the time zone offset across our geographically distributed user base is spot-on — that's exactly the kind of subtle bias that shifts quarterly results.
Which vintage?
What's the population we're measuring? See /u/plg_leane_oakenshld/p/plot-0024.
Good work.
Works for me.
Nice work on the breakdown.
I do not follow — is CO2 per capita going up or down here?
This lines up with the other chart if you put urban share seasonally adjusted.
Right — life expectancy was the part I missed.
This is much clearer, thanks.
Correcting myself: retention is seasonally adjusted, so the comparison holds.
Good catch.
Good point there.