I've noticed that the São Paulo figures diverge sharply from the regional aggregate starting in 2015, even though the accounting standards for subsidiary consolidation shouldn't have changed. The discrepancy might reflect either a change in the reporting entity definition or a methodological shift in how branch operations are included. Can we investigate what changed in that year and whether we need separate treatment?
Duplicated.
I'm convinced.
Lan Vandyk do you know whether 2010 was restated?
This lines up with the other chart if you put throughput as a share of total.
Is this seasonally adjusted, or raw?
Yep. (edited to fix a unit)