Why does the total drop when we add a new region to the breakdown? The logic seems inverted.
Fully aligned. See /u/plg_kai_virtanen/p/plot-0245.
Makes sense, thanks.
The formula in the metadata disagrees with the results. Can we verify which is correct?
The timestamp is in a different timezone.
Should we use a darker background?
Region definition changeRoger that.
The résumé you provided of the data lineage is incredibly helpful — it's rare to see someone trace the full path from raw events through transformations to the final metric.
Thanks , that resolves it.
Context for anyone new: urban share is only comparable index-linked. (edited to fix a unit)
Will pick this up after the refresh.
Is the other chart built from the same extract?
Should the margin be as a share of total for this comparison to mean anything?
That join is producing duplicates.
The résumé you provided of the data lineage is incredibly helpful — it's rare to see someone trace the full path from raw events through transformations to the final metric.
Is this before or after the change set?