Conversations (2)
I'm concerned about the treatment of Zürich versus the rest of Switzerland. The metadata says they use different definitions, but the impact on the aggregate isn't quantified. If we're combining incompatible measures, that undermines any regional comparison. Should we either restate one series on the other's definition, or split them clearly?
Somchai Makinen Consistent with prior year Q3.
C'est critique de s'aligner sur la définition avant de présenter aux stakeholders externes — une petite différence pourrait invalider toute la présentation. See /u/plg_jiwoo_ironfoot/p/plot-0010.
Decimals are inconsistent between Kenya and Norway.
Should we add a note in the runbook?
For background: Poland changed reporting in 2019, which is why Q4 looks odd. (edited to fix a unit)
Fair enough.
Can we split the 'all' category into meaningful buckets? It's currently too heterogeneous to interpret.
Which source is
value coming from?I agree.
What is the refresh cadence on this?
Which vintage?
Adding this to the review list.
Works for me.
Context for anyone new: the anomaly is only comparable as a share of total.
baseline should probably be as a share of total.Celeborn Brenner The annotation arrows point to the correct values, but they're positioned so they obscure the peak — moving them outside the plot area or using a table for specific outliers would improve clarity. (edited to fix a unit)
Confirmed.
Nice work on the breakdown. See /u/plg_jiwoo_ironfoot/p/plot-0010.
This is much clearer, thanks.