The daily figures are so noisy that the trend is hard to see. Should we show a seven-day moving average? See /u/plg_ewin_yates/p/plot-0038.
Clear.
We hit the same thing last Q3. The fix was to hold
raw_metric constant.Right — population was the part I missed.
Minor: the margin is double-counted in the tooltip.
Is this in constant terms, or raw?
Confirmed on my side too.
Context for anyone new: mobile subscriptions is only comparable as a share of total. (edited to fix a unit)
Moving this to the H2 agenda.
Your point about the compounding effect of the time zone offset across our geographically distributed user base is spot-on — that's exactly the kind of subtle bias that shifts quarterly results.
Does this include Mexico after 1997?
Is the 2003 gap a methodology change, or is the series genuinely missing?
Good catch.
The 2017 break is a source revision — it shows up in every series from that source.
The tick marks are too frequent. See /u/plg_ewin_yates/p/plot-0038.
Context for anyone new: headcount is only comparable as a share of total.
Makes sense, thanks.
Well reasoned.
The 2021 break is a methodology change — it shows up in every series from that source.
Why does Norway dip in 1999?
Does this include refunds?
The axis truncation hides the context of where these numbers sit in the range of possible values — what if we extended it to show the historical min/max band behind the current data?
Can you split H1 out?
Right — mobile subscriptions was the part I missed.
Echoes the behavior during the last resize.
Units?
Yep.