Egwene Hammerhand The Zürich exclusion from the regional sum is documented as intentional, but the reason — "methodological incomparability" — is too vague. If Zürich truly can't be aggregated with the rest, that's a critical limitation that affects every regional total. Should we either explain what makes Zürich incompatible or include it with a caveat?
Works for me.
Is the 2001 gap a reporting lag, or is the series genuinely missing?
Same conclusion here.
Nicely done.
Thanks , that resolves it.
This is much clearer, thanks.
FYI.
Fair enough.
I see it.