Conversations (3)
The adjustment_factor field exists in the schema but is null for 95% of rows, which makes it effectively unused. Should we either populate it where adjustments occurred, or should we remove it to reduce schema clutter?
This would be clearer as a table.
Why does the total drop when we add a new region to the breakdown? The logic seems inverted.
The units are missing from the gridlines.
a currency effect in the back half of the series?
Makes sense.
Units?
That's right.
Does this include Vietnam after 2006?
Can we label the tick labels? Hard to read otherwise.
Right — the anomaly was the part I missed. (edited to fix a unit)
That matches what I had.