The Bengaluru figures from 2010-2015 were sourced from a different agency than the 2015-onward figures, and while they overlap for one year (2015), the overlap shows a 12% discrepancy. This offset should be reconciled before using both sources in a continuous series. Should we either restate one to match the other's baseline, or should we split the series at 2015?
I notice the 2019 restatement only affected one metric. Was there a calculation error in just that one?
Why is the weekend data so spotty? Are we collecting it differently?
do you know whether 1996 was restated?