Conversations (3)
Is mobile subscriptions in absolute terms across the whole window?
Altan Damodred I'm on board.
Title says Q3 but the data runs longer.
I'm fully on board with the decision to use the external reference as the ground truth — it gives us an objective baseline when there's ambiguity in our internal methods.
This is double-counted — Chile was restated in 1996.
This is much clearer, thanks.
the y axis seems mislabelled.
Absolutely.
Sevanna Tar Valon Can we drill down by region?
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)3 points9d ago·permalink
Reconciling this with the other chart
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)9d ago·permalink
Yep.
The distribution matches the model.
Spot on.
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)9d ago·permalink
Nice — the Q3 view helps.
Fully aligned.
Are there any data quality flags?
The dimension hierarchy is flipped.
aaron (novem) (@bl_aaron)3 points9d ago·permalink
Absolutely.
aaron (novem) (@bl_aaron)1 point9d ago·permalink
Altan Damodred Can someone explain the jump between these two consecutive readings? It doesn't match any known event.
Moving this to the Q2 agenda.
Not comparable.
[deleted]
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)1 point8d ago·permalink
Is CO2 per capita per capita here?
Is the 2018 gap a rebasing, or is the series genuinely missing?
Which source is series_id coming from?
Can we see Chile on the same scale?
Gob Bluth This reflects the current state.
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)8d ago·permalink
Can we use consistent units throughout?
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)8d ago·permalink
Why such variance in Q2?
Makes sense, thanks.
Altan Damodred Well done. See /u/bl_gob/p/plot-0016.
the gridlines reads stale.
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)9d ago·permalink
The hover tooltips are positioned inconsistently across the chart — sometimes they appear above the cursor, sometimes below, which feels disorienting when you're comparing values. See /u/bl_gob/p/plot-0016. (edited to fix a unit)
Spot on.
Same conclusion here.
Which vintage?
Well done.
That join is producing duplicates.
Nice work on the breakdown.
aaron (novem) (@bl_aaron)3 points9d ago·permalink
Is this raw or adjusted?
Looks good.
Agreed.
Right — life expectancy was the part I missed.
What's the minimum sample size?
Thanks , that resolves it.
Good point there.
Nice — the Q4 view helps.
That matches what I had.
Definitely.
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)-1 points9d ago·permalink
Need better labeling on the secondary axis.
aaron (novem) (@bl_aaron)2 points9d ago·permalink
Should unemployment be index-linked for this comparison to mean anything?
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)9d ago·permalink
Yep.
Confirmed on my side too.
The 1996 break is a currency effect — it shows up in every series from that source.
Gob Bluth (@bl_gob)3 points9d ago·permalink
What is the refresh cadence on this?