the legend on this chart
Missing the cohort-based correction.
Should throughput be index-linked for this comparison to mean anything? (edited to fix a unit)
Does this include Norway after 2013?
Reconciling this with the other chart
Makes sense, thanks.
population here is inverted; it should be as a share of total.
Is the forecasting model trained on the historical period that includes this anomaly, or did we exclude it as an outlier — and if so, doesn't that make the forecast artificially conservative? See /u/bl_faile_abadi/p/plot-0027.
Worth noting the US and Vietnam are not measured the same way over the post-2020 window.
Berelain Morrow Following up on the previous investigation.
Fair enough.
The filter dropped some rows.
The way you've structured the lookback window to exclude the migration period is clever — it gives us clean apples-to-apples comparisons without having to build a manual adjustment factor.
That's fair.