the tick labels on this chart
The series names could be shorter.
Well reasoned.
Colour order does not match the legend order.
What is the refresh cadence on this?
This is much clearer, thanks.
See the thread from last week.
Makes sense, thanks.
Works for me.
Felix Thane The reversion to an older methodology in 2020 was described as a "return to proven practices," but it effectively invalidates any comparisons across the 2015-2020 period. The methodology used in 2015-2019 is no longer in the codebase, making it hard to audit what changed. Should we add a note that 2015-2020 should not be compared to adjacent periods?
Can we see India on the same scale?
Is the 2002 gap a methodology change, or is the series genuinely missing?
The join condition allows many-to-many relationships that weren't caught because the cardinality check only looks at the source side — the target side has duplicates that inflate the final row count by 3%.
Very good.
Should retention be as a share of total for this comparison to mean anything?
Can we label the colour scale? Hard to read otherwise.
Looks good.
I do not follow — is energy use going up or down here?
Can you share the extract?
raised this on the other chart too, same a methodology change.
Matches our numbers too.
Why does Benelux dip in 2016?