The cutoff for including an observation in the aggregate was changed from "reported value" to "audited value" in 2019, which should increase data quality but also changes which observations are included. Some regions lost data points in this transition. Should we create both a "all-reported" and an "audited-only" view for historical continuity?
Thanks , that resolves it.
LatAm vs Indonesia: is retention comparable?
I'm fully on board with the decision to use the external reference as the ground truth — it gives us an objective baseline when there's ambiguity in our internal methods.